fbpx
Picture copyrightJenny Goodall/Each day Mail
Picture caption Sid Ouared mentioned a BA supervisor informed him he had “lady’s hair”

A British Airways check-in employee has mentioned the corporate’s gown code discriminated towards him after he was sacked for his man bun coiffure.

Londoner Sid Ouared claims he was fired from his job at Heathrow as a result of he refused to alter his look.

He mentioned the type was accepted for girls however he was ordered to chop it, put on a turban or type his hair in dreadlocks.

The corporate mentioned it didn’t touch upon particular person employment issues.

Mr Ouared, who’s 26, mentioned he was informed he was being dismissed after solely a few weeks within the job as a result of his hair didn’t conform to the uniform requirements.

‘Caught within the 1970s’

He mentioned: “It is ridiculous in 2018. There are increasingly males which have the identical coiffure as me. There’s 100% sexism occurring.”

The “man bun” coiffure has been worn by celebrities equivalent to footballer Gareth Bale and singer Harry Types.

“BA are caught within the 1970s, their coverage could be very a lot from the 1970s, it isn’t conforming with our occasions,” Mr Ouared mentioned.

The airline points tips for workers sporting uniforms, which says males’s hair should not fall over the face or contact the shirt collar. Ponytails are solely acceptable for males with dreadlocks, it says.

Girls have their very own necessities relating to hairstyles, together with a ban on close-shaven hair, together with guidelines on hosiery, make-up and skirt size.

Throughout the interview course of, Mr Ouared mentioned nobody talked about his hair, though managers did ask him about tattoos and piercings, which he doesn’t have.

However early in his coaching a line supervisor informed him he must minimize his hair.

Picture copyrightGetty Photographs
Picture caption Actual Madrid and Wales winger Gareth Bale is among the many stars seen sporting a person bun

He says a extra senior supervisor described his hair as “women’ hair” and mentioned if he didn’t put on it shorter, he must put on a turban or type it in dreadlocks.

“I did not need to minimize my hair as a result of I have been employed by a number of firms and I’ve by no means ever been informed that my hair has been a difficulty,” Mr Ouared mentioned.

He mentioned {that a} turban or dreadlocks have been spiritual gown for Sikhs and Rastafarians, which he didn’t regard as acceptable for him. “I do not even know the way to put a turban on,” he mentioned.

Typical look

The bun was a mode incessantly worn by feminine employees, in keeping with Mr Ouared.

He mentioned: “I used to be made to really feel like a black sheep, I felt discriminated towards.”

Beverley Sunderland, managing director of Crossland Employment Solicitors, mentioned that employers have been allowed to require a “typical commonplace of look” which may be totally different for women and men.

Picture copyrightSid Ouared

That call got here in a 1996 Courtroom of Attraction case the place a person with lengthy hair had complained that his employer, Safeway, required him to chop it.

However she mentioned a case at this time would depend upon whether or not males with lengthy hair tied up in a bun have been now thought of sufficiently “typical”.

Ms Sunderland mentioned: “What won’t have been a traditional look at one stage may be now. I wasn’t allowed to put on trousers at work 30 years in the past. All that has modified.”

Different males have taken a stand towards restrictive guidelines on workplace trend in different methods.

He returned in a pink and black gown, prompting the corporate to loosen up its perspective to shorts.

This content material was initially printed here.

close

Join our fast growing Moroccan Moms Community

Categories: Beauty

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published.